The Four Corners Art
  • Home/Events
  • robert bruce scott
  • Lisa Haddad
  • Randy L Purcell
  • Eva Sochorova
  • Talk about it!

"Finished Painting=Dead Painting"?

6/18/2010

2 Comments

 
Hello.  I guess that this is the first, of hopefully many, posts for discussion.  I thought that I would start off with a wide topic and with the help of you guys, whittle it down as much as possible.  So, with trepidation but a song in my heart, here we go.
How does an artist know when a work of art is finished?  Is it possible to tell?  Is it even a desirable thing to totally complete a piece?  Is it true that a work can "speak" to the artist and tell her that it is at a point when further fiddling and "improving" will destroy what has been so painstakingly created?  In my experience, I have found that there is a point at which I sense that I should not go any further.  If I am quiet and listen to it, things sometimes work out nicely.  When I ignore that gut feeling, I inevitably screw something up.  Not all accidents are happy ones for an artist and when the crash is brought on by his desire to "fix" something or add something to "round out" a piece the results are most often a trainwreck.  Beautiful highlights and shading become muddy.  Colours become blurred.  Hard lines soft and vice versa.  Actually, the entire feeling created by the work in its initial "finished" state can be lost forever to meddling.  You may say that it's entirely up to the artist to take a piece as far as she possibly can.  We are often taught this, and encouraged to never be satisfied until absolutely every nook and cranny of an artwork is filled to capacity.  I was lucky enough to have an instructor who believed in the less-is-more approach and that negative space was just as important as the positive additions.  So, how does one decide?  What is too much?  What is too little?  What criteria can or should be used to discern the completeness of a work?  I think that the more simple and straightforward approach is often the best from the viewer's standpoint.  This does not mean that there can be no depth to a work or deeper meanings, thoughts, approaches, what-have-you.  But to be clear and concise engages the viewer and invites him in to the deeper world.  What is clear and concise?  How do we know?  Can we?  Do we work until we are tired of a piece and then call it finished?  Do we ask someone else, "Does this look finished to you?"  Well, that's the topic.  So let's go at it.  I know that I could use some help with this question.  I'm guilty of both destroying a piece, and backing off before there is anything of substance there at all.  Where's the balance?  --- rbs
2 Comments

Post Title.

6/14/2010

3 Comments

 
Hey Everyone, First blog!  I like having a place to see the progression of these collages.  Wish I could find the old polka-dot image.  It was from a series I abandoned pretty quick - they were supposed to be faces, ha ha.  Still see the face in this one and the polka-dot tie/.  Hope that doesn't wreck it... Lisa
3 Comments

First Blog Post to test how to use.

6/11/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
Here is a blog to test how it works. I'll try adding a photo and see if I can get that to work.
1 Comment

First Post!

6/10/2010

1 Comment

 
Start blogging by creating a new post. You can edit or delete me by clicking under the comments. You can also customize your sidebar by dragging in elements from the top bar.
1 Comment
Forward>>

    Author

    These posts could be from any of the Collage Collective. We try to post things important to us and our work. We haven't really promoted this page, but if you would like to join the discussion please do so. thanks for coming by. RLP.

    Archives

    September 2017
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010

    Categories

    All
    Test Blog!

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.